Avaliação da qualidade metodológica de meta-análises sobre intervenções para a redução da reiteração infracional juvenil
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
A qualidade metodológica empregada nas pesquisas impacta o seus resultados, podendo produzir vieses. Assim, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática de outras revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises acerca da eficácia de programas de intervenção psicossocial para redução da reiteração infracional em jovens infratores, visando descrever suas características e avaliar seu rigor metodológico. Dentre os 25 artigos incluídos, verificou-se que a maioria (n= 15) foi proveniente dos Estados Unidos, assim como a maior parte dos estudos (n= 20) realizou cálculos meta-analíticos em detrimento das sínteses narrativas. Ademais, os artigos incluídos apresentaram uma produção crescente a partir do anos 2000, com publicações entre 1985 e 2023. A qualidade metodológica da maioria dos artigos (n= 18) foi classificada pela ferramenta AMSTAR-2 como criticamente baixa. As características dos artigos incluídos podem ser compreendidas por meio de dados históricos acerca do desenvolvimento sociopolítico do sistema de justiça juvenil e do desenvolvimento científico do próprio método meta-analítico. Por sua vez, a baixa qualidade metodológica verificada aponta para a falta de transparência na produção de relatórios de meta-análises no campo de estudo voltados à eficácia de intervenções psicossociais. Desse modo, são discutidos alguns caminhos possíveis para transpor as lacunas existentes.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La cesión de derechos no exclusivos implica también la autorización por parte de los autores para que el trabajo sea alojado en los repositorios institucionales UNLP (Sedici y Memoria Académica) y difundido a través de las bases de datos que los editores consideren apropiadas para su indización, con miras a incrementar la visibilidad de la revista y sus autores.
Citas
Blackburn, S. (2019). Juvenile Justice in Pennsylvania: Mission‐Driven; Performance‐ Based; Outcome‐Focused. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 70(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12127
Cathey, D. (2019). Relatório Mundial 2020: Rights Trends in Estados Unidos. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/pt/world-report/country-chapters/united-states
Cheng, S.-Y., Davis, M., Jonson-Reid, M., y Yaeger, L. (2021). Compared to What? A Meta-Analysis of Batterer Intervention Studies Using Nontreated Controls or Comparisons. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 22(3), 496-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019865927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019865927
Cullen, F. T. (2013). Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 299–376. https://doi.org/10.1086/670395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/670395
Elliott, D. S., Buckley, P. R., Gottfredson, D. C., Hawkins, J. D., y Tolan, P. H. (2020). Evidence‐based juvenile justice programs and practices: A critical review. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12520
Glass, G. V. (2015). Meta-analysis at middle age: a personal history. Research Synthesis Methods, 6(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1133
Goshe, S. (2019). How Contemporary Rehabilitation Fails Youth and Sabotages the American Juvenile Justice System: A Critique and Call for Change. Crit Crim, 27, 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09473-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09473-5
Moosavi, L. (2019). A Friendly Critique of 'Asian Criminology' and 'Southern Criminology'. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy045
Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview. Victims & Offenders, 4(2), 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573
Lipsey, M. W. (2020). Revisited: Effective use of the large body of research on the effectiveness of programs for juvenile offenders and the failure of the model programs approach. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(4), 1329–1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12530
Lipsey, M. W., Howell, J. C., y Tidd, S. T. (2007). The standardized program evaluation protocol (SPEP): A practical approach to evaluating and improving juvenile justice programs in North Carolina. Final evaluation report. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. Available from author, Retrieved from http://mark.lipsey@vanderbilt.edu
López-Nicolás, R., López-López, J.A., Rubio-Aparicio, M. et al (2022). A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000–2020). Behavior Research Method, 54, 334–349. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01644-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01644-z
Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C. A., Jones, B., y Hawes, S. (2020). A validation of SPEP™ in Pennsylvania. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. Retrieved from https://www.pccd.pa.gov/Juvenile-Justice/Documents/A%20Validation%20of%20SPEP%20in%20PA%20Report.pdf
Pigott, T. D., y Polanin, J. R. (2020). Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
Polanin, J. R., Hennessy, E. A., y Tsuji, S. (2020). Transparency and Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Meta-Review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1026-1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906416
Redpath, D. P., y Brandner, J. K. (2010). The Arizona standardized program evaluation protocol (SPEP) for assessing the effectiveness of programs for juvenile probationers: SPEP rating and relative recidivism reduction: An update to the January 2008 Retrieved from https://my.vanderbilt.edu/spep/files/2013/04/AZ-SPEP-Recidivism-Analysis_Update_-2010.pdf
Schwarzer, G., Chemaitelly, H., Abu‐Raddad, L. J., y Rücker, G. (2019). Seriously misleading results using inverse of freeman‐tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(3), 476-483. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1348
Sera, F., Armstrong, B., Blangiardo, M., y Gasparrini, A. (2019). An extended mixed-effects framework for meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 38(29), 5429-5444. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8362
Shadish, W. R., y Lecy, J. D. (2015). The meta-analytic big bang. Research Synthesis Methods, 6(3), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1132
Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., et al. (2017). AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ [Internet]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
Tanner-Smith, E.E., Lipsey, M.W. y Wilson, D.B. Juvenile drug court effects on recidivism and drug use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Exp Criminol, 12, 477–513 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9274-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9274-y
Wong, J. S., y Bouchard, J. (2023). Do Meta-Analyses of Intervention/Prevention Programs in the Field of Criminology Meet the Tests of Transparency and Reproducibility? Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1522-1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211073839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211073839